← All Montana counties
Roosevelt County · Montana County Report

Roosevelt County, Montana

Northeast Montana Missouri River breaks · Wolf Point · Missouri River and Poplar River confluence · US-2 Hi-Line

Use this page to:
  • Check current snowpack, drought, streamflow, and soil moisture before stocking, hay buying, or destocking.
  • See where Roosevelt County calves moved in 2023 — destinations, seasonal pattern, and shipping windows.
  • Look up water rights, parcels, and ownership via Cadastral, DNRC WRQS, and WaterMapper.
  • Reach the District 6 brand inspector and verify cattle-buyer bonds before consigning.
Dashboard refreshes daily at 5:30 AM Mountain
Hay & Pasture — Greenness Now Greenness: High · 85th percentile vs local normalA current satellite greenness read (last 16 days) of this county’s managed hay & pasture ground (NLCD class 81), versus its own history. It can run ahead of or behind snowpack and streamflow — read it alongside those tiles, not instead of them. Updated weekly.
How often this updates. The moisture and drought tiles below — snowpack, streamflow, soil moisture, rain, water-year precipitation, and drought class — refresh every morning. The Forage Condition score’s satellite vegetation read, and the separate Hay & Pasture read, refresh weekly (Mondays), because the underlying satellite imagery (RAP herbaceous biomass and MODIS NDVI; until the current season’s RAP publishes, a soil-moisture proxy stands in for the vegetation input) only updates on a roughly 16-day cycle. So the water and drought tiles move day to day, while the vegetation and hay-pasture reads step forward about once a week — a dry spell shows in the moisture tiles within a day, but takes a week or two to register in observed greenness.
❄

Snowpack · SWE

No SNOTEL stations in this county. Basin-index snowpack not tracked.

☂

Water-Year Precip

Water-year precip index not tracked for this county.

☼

Drought Monitor

D1moderate drought

Worst drought class anywhere in the county per the U.S. Drought Monitor.

D0 26%D1 1%D2 0%D3 0%D4 0%

D0 abnormally dry · D1 moderate · D2 severe · D3 extreme · D4 exceptional. Percentages = share of county area at or worse than each class.

≈

Streamflow

46cfs

Cubic feet per second flowing past the nearest in-county USGS gauge right now.

Poplar River near Poplar
Day-of-year percentile: 90 (50 = typical for this date; 0 = lowest ever; 100 = highest ever)
◉

Soil Moisture

24.7% shallow VWC
Drying for the growing season

VWC = Volumetric Water Content — the percent of soil volume that is water. Montana Mesonet probe average.

24.7%
17.9%

Shallow ≈ 4″ depth · Deep ≈ 20″ depth.
Bands (shallow + deep average): ≥ 30 % moist · 22–30 % adequate · 15–22 % drying · < 15 % dry.

Stations: 1
Δ

Precip Anomaly

+0.02″12-mo vs normal
Near normal for the rolling 12-month window

Inches above (+) or below (−) the 1901–2000 average for the latest completed 1-, 3- and 12-month periods (NOAA NCEI, monthly data) — not the water year (see the separate Water-Year Precip tile for that).

+0.55″
+1.21″
+0.02″

1-mo = last 30 days · 3-mo = last 90 days · 12-mo = trailing year.
12-mo bands: > +1″ wet · −0.5″ to +1″ near normal · −2″ to −0.5″ dry · < −2″ very dry.

Reading this dashboard — what these terms mean

Median vs. mean. We use the median (NRCS standard) so a single very-wet or very-dry year doesn’t skew the baseline.

Water year. Hydrology runs Oct 1 → Sep 30. Most of a year’s snowpack accumulation is captured in the same season it melts.

Percentile (streamflow). 50 = exactly typical for this calendar date. 19 = today’s flow is lower than 81 % of all readings ever recorded on this date. 81 = lower than only 19 %.

VWC (soil moisture). Volumetric Water Content. Rough field bands: under 10 % = dry, 15–25 % = productive growing-season range, over 35 % = saturated.

Drought scale. D0–D4 from the U.S. Drought Monitor, weekly Thursday release. The percentages tell you what fraction of county area is at or worse than each band — a county can be 100 % at D2 with 0 % at D3.

Precip anomaly. Inches above or below the 1901–2000 average for the latest completed 1-, 3- and 12-month periods (NOAA NCEI Climate at a Glance, monthly data). Not the water year — the Water-Year Precip tile is the water-year measure. Anomaly is in inches; “% of median” is a ratio. Both useful; anomaly is easier to interpret when comparing a dry summer month to a wet spring month.

Forage Condition. A 0–100 county-scale index of rangeland forage conditions relative to this county’s own historical normal, blending satellite-observed vegetation response, growing-season moisture, drought stress, and usability. Higher = more favorable relative to local normal. Categories: 0–25 Poor, 26–50 Fair, 51–75 Good, 76–100 Excellent. Long-Term Forage Potential is a separate long-run rating, not part of the score. Beta — for regional screening and comparison, not a pasture-level forage inventory or stocking-rate recommendation.

How often this updates. The moisture and drought tiles (snowpack, streamflow, soil moisture, rain, water-year precip, drought class) refresh every morning. The Forage Condition score’s satellite vegetation read — and the separate Hay & Pasture read — refresh weekly (Mondays), because the underlying satellite imagery only updates on a ~16-day cycle. So the water tiles move day to day; the vegetation reads step forward about once a week.

Snowpack & Moisture Detail

SNOTEL station-by-station read for Roosevelt County. The dashboard above gives current aggregate; this section shows where the water actually is.

Roosevelt County’s primary water supply flows through it — the Missouri River carries upstream Rocky Mountain snowmelt regulated through Fort Peck Reservoir in Valley County, providing a more reliable base flow than purely local precipitation. Tributary systems including the Poplar River enter from the north with unregulated prairie flows. The county benefits from Fort Peck’s carryover storage in dry cycles, though river-bottom irrigation allocations are still subject to senior priority administration.

Basin Index: Missouri River flows at Wolf Point reflect Fort Peck Reservoir releases upstream; local tributary inputs from the Poplar and Big Muddy are precipitation-driven and highly variable. Drought Monitor (valid 2026-11-10): Worst class D1 (moderate) over 1% of the county. Coverage at or worse than each class: D0 26%, D1 1%, D2 0%, D3 0%, D4 0%. Station snapshot as of November 13, 2026 — live dashboard above is current.

Rancher implication. As of November 13, 2026: moderate drought (D1) covers 1% of Roosevelt County; the past two weeks of rainfall ran well below normal (44%) and the next two are forecast well below normal (0%), so little soil-moisture recharge is expected — watch forage and stock-water closely. Operations dependent on junior water rights should watch DNRC curtailment notices. Private treaty cattle buyers are active in this region through fall; current range conditions will factor into negotiated price slides.

Two-Week Rainfall

Observed (prior 14 days) and forecast (next 14 days) · Roosevelt County · as of 2026-11-13

PeriodWindowRain (in)Normal (in)% of Normal
Prior 2 weeks (observed)Oct 30 – Nov 12, 20260.210.4844%
Next 2 weeks (forecast)Nov 13 – Nov 26, 20260.000.270%

Observed detail: 2 measurable-rain day(s) in the prior two weeks; largest single day 0.19 in.

Forecast source: NWS/NOAA api.weather.gov (days 1–7) blended with Open-Meteo gridded model (days 8–14). The next-14-day total is model-derived — NOAA quantitative precipitation forecast is precise only through ~7 days, and days 8–14 are a model blend, not an observed gauge reading.

What this means. “Percent of normal” compares actual rain to the 30-year (1991–2020) average for the same calendar dates: 100% is a typical year, below 100% is drier than usual, above is wetter. Here, the past two weeks delivered 0.21 in of rain — 44% of the 0.48 in normally expected for this window, i.e. well below normal; the next two weeks are forecast at 0.00 in (0% of normal, near-zero), so little to no meaningful soil-moisture recharge is expected.

Moisture Outlook: 1, 3, 6 and 12 Months

Expected precipitation against the 1991–2020 normal · Roosevelt County · NOAA seasonal outlook issued Oct 15, 2026; monthly outlook Oct 31, 2026 · refreshed monthly

HorizonWindowNormal (in)Expected (in)% of NormalLeanConfidence
1 monthNovember 20260.440.45103%Slight wet leanModerate
3 monthsNov 2026–Jan 20271.191.1597%Slight dry leanLow to moderate
6 monthsNov 2026–Apr 20272.942.9099%No clear signalLow
12 monthsNov 2026–Oct 202714.0313.8499%No clear signalVery low
  • Odds, November 2026: 31% chance of a drier-than-normal month, 34% near normal, 35% wetter.
  • Odds, Nov 2026–Jan 2027: 36% drier than normal, 34% near normal, 30% wetter.
  • Temperature: November 2026 leans warmer than normal (65% chance of a warmer-than-normal month); Nov 2026–Jan 2027 leans warmer than normal (45% chance of a warmer-than-normal three months). Warmer weather pulls more moisture out of soil and snowpack.
  • Spring growing season (Apr–Jun 2027): these three months normally bring 6.29 in, about 45% of the year’s moisture. NOAA’s early read: 36% drier, 34% near normal, 30% wetter — expected 6.15 in (98% of normal).
What this means. An outlook is a tilt in the odds, not a promise. For Nov 2026–Jan 2027, NOAA’s outlook trims about 0.04 in from the 1.19 in Roosevelt County normally receives — small next to the roughly 1.3 in gap between a typical dry and a typical wet three-month stretch here. Over the full 12 months the county is expected to receive 13.8 in against a normal of 14.0 in (99%). Treat the 1- and 3-month rows as usable guidance and the 6- and 12-month rows as a planning baseline that mostly reflects normal weather.

How it is built: NOAA Climate Prediction Center outlook odds read across Roosevelt County, applied to the county’s 1991–2020 precipitation record (NOAA NCEI). Inches are county-wide averages that include mountain ground, so valley and bench ranches usually receive less; the percent of normal carries over better than the inches. Full method and limits → Prepared by Dirk Adams with the assistance of AI.

Water Rights, Irrigation & Land Ownership

The Missouri River bisects Roosevelt County east-west, with Wolf Point and Culbertson as the main river-corridor towns. The Poplar River enters from the north near Poplar, and Big Muddy Creek joins near Culbertson, both adding unregulated prairie tributary flows to the main stem.

Missouri River water rights in Roosevelt County are among the older and more senior in the state, with irrigation filings dating to the early 1900s along the river bottoms. Fort Peck Reservoir storage upstream in Valley County provides buffered releases that moderate low-flow years for downstream junior rights holders. The Fort Peck Indian Reservation covers the northern half of Roosevelt County, and tribal water rights under the federal reserved rights doctrine hold senior priority over state-based appropriations on multiple reaches. Over-allocation is a real concern on smaller tributaries in dry years. River-bottom irrigated meadows typically produce two cuttings of alfalfa or alfalfa-grass mix; upland range is dryland only. Rural water districts serve most stock-water needs away from the river corridor.

Federal Grazing Leases

BLM and U.S. Forest Service permitted grazing on public-land allotments · Roosevelt County

SystemAllotmentsPermitted usePublic acres
BLM151,197 AUMs4,365
U.S. Forest Service0——

AUMs (BLM) and head-months (USFS) are both animal-unit-months — one animal grazing for one month, the standard measure of authorized use. Acres are BLM public acres and USFS GIS acres on the mapped allotments.

Statewide maps: BLM allotment map · Forest Service allotment map. Excludes Montana DNRC state-trust grazing leases.

Land Resources

Three independent estimates of how Roosevelt County’s land is used — shown side by side, never blended

Every acreage figure below comes from an independent source that measures the land a different way. We show them side by side — and never blend reported acreage, satellite pixels and tax classifications into one unexplained number. Total county area 1,506,945 acres · land in farms 1,218,335 acres (81% of the county).

🗺  Open the interactive land map for Roosevelt County →
See crops, range, irrigated fields, public land and ownership parcels drawn live on the map.

Principal crops — official vs. satellite

CropUSDA Census 2022
(acres harvested)
Satellite CDL 2023
(acres present)
Winter wheat33,9949,351
Spring wheat260,128368,125
Durum wheat83,05666,769
Barley12,61913,207
Oats5282,759
Corn4513,769
Alfalfa hay26,93966,834
Other hay15,627100,115
Sugarbeets1,7501
Dry peas47,09264,773
Lentils52,92639,833
Dry beans720149
Chickpeas1,3853,025
Safflowerwithheld361
Canola16,27212,135
Flaxseed16,3485,692
Soybeans8571,421
Sorghum—389

These columns measure different things, so they should not match. The Census counts acres actually harvested in the census year, as reported by producers; the Cropland Data Layer counts every acre the satellite saw in that crop, including fields in a crop–fallow rotation and stands not harvested. Winter wheat is the clearest example: much of the county’s wheat ground sits in fallow in any given year, so the satellite total runs well above harvested acres. CDL also over-attributes hay and forage on native range. “Withheld” means the Census suppressed the value to protect an individual operation’s privacy.

How the county’s acres classify

Land classUSDA Census 2022Satellite CDL 2023DOR assessment 2026
Cropland (total)725,331789,668584,486
  of which harvested601,522——
Irrigated land12,003—19,405
Pasture & rangeland479,238631,980398,126
Forest / woodland1,4042,238—
Developed—22,715—
Water & wetlands—69,780—

Three ways of counting the same ground. Census figures are producer-reported acres in farms; the satellite column is a wall-to-wall pixel classification of the whole county (so it also sees developed land, water and non-farm ground the others do not); the assessment column is the Montana Department of Revenue’s parcel-level tax classification (CAMA), which is why its cropland total tracks the Census closely while the satellite tends to run higher. Developed and open-water rows come only from the satellite. Where they disagree, no single number is “wrong” — they are measuring different things.

Irrigated land, three independent ways

12,003
USDA Census
harvested irrigated cropland, 2022
26,876
DNRC mapped
remote-sensed irrigated extent
19,405
DOR assessed
tax classification, 2026

The single most important acreage figure for a cattle operation, and the three sources genuinely differ. The Census counts acres actually irrigated and harvested in the census year; the Montana DOR figure is what is classified and taxed as irrigated; the DNRC mapping captures the full remote-sensed irrigated extent, including ground that carries irrigation but was idle or in another use that year — so it usually reads highest. We publish all three rather than pick one.

What each estimate means

  • USDA Census of Agriculture — producer-reported, the official record. Highly credible, but taken every five years and suppressed in counties where a value would identify a single operation.
  • Satellite (Cropland Data Layer) — USDA’s annual, wall-to-wall satellite classification. Complete county coverage every year, but it infers crops from imagery, so it mislabels some ground and over-calls hay and forage on native range.
  • Tax / assessment — Montana Department of Revenue parcel-level classification from the CAMA assessment roll (2026 tax year), aggregated from the Montana State Library cadastral. Parcel- and ownership-based; a land classification, not an annual crop report.

Sources: USDA NASS Census of Agriculture 2022 (Quick Stats); USDA Cropland Data Layer 2023 (CropScape zonal statistics, USDA-NASS); Montana Department of Revenue CAMA assessment acreage via the MSDI cadastral parcels layer (tax year 2026); Montana DNRC Statewide Irrigation dataset. Prepared by Dirk Adams with the assistance of AI.

Local Help

Verified contacts and official destinations for Roosevelt County — not a directory dump, just where to actually call

Local education
MSU Extension · Roosevelt County
Agriculture, natural-resource and 4-H programs, plus hay- and soil-testing guidance.
Open office page →
Conservation
USDA Service Center
The NRCS and FSA offices serving Roosevelt County — conservation programs and farm loans.
Official USDA locator →
Water rights
DNRC Glasgow Regional Office
Permits, changes, ownership updates and water-right questions for this county.
406-228-2561
DNRC water resources →
Cattle market
Montana Livestock Markets
Licensed auction markets, sale schedules and posted market reports statewide.
State market listing →
Brand inspection
Montana Brands Enforcement
Brand records, inspection districts and livestock-movement rules.
Dept. of Livestock →
Diagnostics
Schutter Diagnostic Lab
Plant, weed, insect and crop-disease diagnosis (MSU).
406-994-5150
Animal disease → MT Veterinary Diagnostic Lab
Lab guidance →

Extension, USDA, market, brand and diagnostic links go to the official Montana source; the DNRC office and phone are the specific regional office serving this county. Provider directories (veterinarians, feed dealers) will be added only once a repeatable verification standard is in place. Prepared by Dirk Adams with the assistance of AI.

Production & Sales

Operation character, hay base, and how cattle reach market from Roosevelt County.

Cattle production

Roosevelt County supports a layered production structure: river-bottom operations running irrigated hay and cow-calf pairs, upland dryland ranches on the breaks north and south of the Missouri, and Fort Peck tribal operations on the reservation. Commercial Angus and Angus-cross dominate off-reservation; tribal ranches run a mix of breeds including some retained Hereford-influence genetics. Operation size ranges widely from 100-cow family units to larger tribal herd enterprises. Some stocker and yearling programs exist on the better grass range in the breaks country.

Hay & winter feed

Irrigated alfalfa and alfalfa-grass hay from the Missouri River bottoms is the county’s premium forage product, typically supporting two cuttings with first cutting in mid-June and second in early August. Upland operators rely on dryland native hay and crested wheatgrass meadows, which produce one cut in July weather permitting. River-bottom hay quality is consistently higher and serves as a trade commodity trucked to neighboring dryland counties in short years.

Logistics · sale barns & trucking

Wolf Point on US-2 is the county seat and commercial center, with the Hi-Line railroad corridor and US-2 providing east-west movement. Wolf Point Livestock is the primary local sale barn. Culbertson handles some sales east toward the North Dakota border. Trucking to Billings is approximately 5 hours via US-2 west to Glasgow then south; Glendive is 2.5 hours southeast on Highway 16 and US-2. Spring breakup and gumbo roads on county two-tracks can isolate some operations for 2–4 weeks.

Licensed Processing Plants

No federally inspected or state-inspected processing plant currently operates in Roosevelt County — the nearest licensed plants are listed below

State inspected · MT Dept. of Livestock
Craig’s Meat Processing
Richland County
Est. 164 · License 2082
10668 MT-16, Savage, MT 59262
(406) 776-2447
Processing onlyjerky products
Federally inspected · USDA FSIS
Ranchers’ Best Meats
Custer County
Est. M7679 · P7679
55 Wyttenhove Ln., Miles City, MT 59301
(406) 234-1961
Slaughter + processingmeat & poultry

Meat from federally inspected and state-inspected plants can be sold; custom-exempt plants are not listed here. Verified August 2026 against the USDA FSIS Meat, Poultry & Egg Product Inspection Directory and the Montana Department of Livestock state plant list (Jan 2026). Grants of inspection change — call before you haul.

Roosevelt County — 2023 Cattle Movement

Source: Montana Department of Livestock, BE-10 brand inspections. Released to Honest Cattle under public-records request. BE-10 inspections are recorded at change of ownership or interstate movement, so totals reflect transactions, not the standing herd.

Total head inspected
18,475
Stayed in Montana
6,019 (32.6%)
Shipped out of state
12,456 (67.4%)
Peak shipping month
November (4,182)

Top destinations outside Montana

StateHeadShare of county total
Nebraska3,79220.5%
North Dakota2,20011.9%
South Dakota2,17311.8%
Minnesota1,4267.7%
Colorado9815.3%

When Roosevelt County cattle moved in 2023

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec

Notes: A single animal can be inspected more than once in a year if it changes hands or moves across state lines twice; destination is the buyer's state of record, which is usually but not always the final feedlot. Inspection county = where the inspection took place (often an auction yard or shipping point), not necessarily where the cattle were raised. Data covers cattle only (BE-10) and excludes horse and bison inspections.

Get the Weekly Forecast in Your Inbox

A short read of the Montana cattle market, in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Free weekly email. Reply “stop” to any issue and you’re off the list that week.