← All Montana counties
Powell County · Montana County Report

Powell County, Montana

West-central Montana · Deer Lodge · Clark Fork River corridor · US-12 connects to Missoula 60 miles west

Use this page to:
  • Check current snowpack, drought, streamflow, and soil moisture before stocking, hay buying, or destocking.
  • See where Powell County calves moved in 2023 — destinations, seasonal pattern, and shipping windows.
  • Look up water rights, parcels, and ownership via Cadastral, DNRC WRQS, and WaterMapper.
  • Reach the District 10 brand inspector and verify cattle-buyer bonds before consigning.
Dashboard refreshes daily at 5:30 AM Mountain
Hay & Pasture — Greenness Now Greenness: High · 95th percentile vs local normalA current satellite greenness read (last 16 days) of this county’s managed hay & pasture ground (NLCD class 81), versus its own history. It can run ahead of or behind snowpack and streamflow — read it alongside those tiles, not instead of them. Updated weekly.
How often this updates. The moisture and drought tiles below — snowpack, streamflow, soil moisture, rain, water-year precipitation, and drought class — refresh every morning. The Forage Condition score’s satellite vegetation read, and the separate Hay & Pasture read, refresh weekly (Mondays), because the underlying satellite imagery (RAP herbaceous biomass and MODIS NDVI; until the current season’s RAP publishes, a soil-moisture proxy stands in for the vegetation input) only updates on a roughly 16-day cycle. So the water and drought tiles move day to day, while the vegetation and hay-pasture reads step forward about once a week — a dry spell shows in the moisture tiles within a day, but takes a week or two to register in observed greenness.

Snowpack · SWE

0.00in SWE

Snow Water Equivalent — water that would result if today’s snowpack melted now.

7-day trend →
% of 1991–2020 median: 0%

Water-Year Precip

34.50in since Oct 1

Total precipitation since Oct 1 — the start of the NRCS water year.

% of 1991–2020 median for this date: 136%

Drought Monitor

D0abnormally dry

Worst drought class anywhere in the county per the U.S. Drought Monitor.

D0 21%D1 0%D2 0%D3 0%D4 0%

D0 abnormally dry · D1 moderate · D2 severe · D3 extreme · D4 exceptional. Percentages = share of county area at or worse than each class.

Streamflow

118cfs

Cubic feet per second flowing past the nearest in-county USGS gauge right now.

Clark Fork at Deer Lodge
Day-of-year percentile: 29 (50 = typical for this date; 0 = lowest ever; 100 = highest ever)

Soil Moisture

No Montana Mesonet soil-moisture station in this county.

Δ

Precip Anomaly

+4.08″12-mo vs normal
Wet year for the rolling 12-month window

Inches above (+) or below (−) the 1901–2000 average for the latest completed 1-, 3- and 12-month periods (NOAA NCEI, monthly data) — not the water year (see the separate Water-Year Precip tile for that).

-0.23″
-0.32″
+4.08″

1-mo = last 30 days · 3-mo = last 90 days · 12-mo = trailing year.
12-mo bands: > +1″ wet · −0.5″ to +1″ near normal · −2″ to −0.5″ dry · < −2″ very dry.

Reading this dashboard — what these terms mean

Median vs. mean. We use the median (NRCS standard) so a single very-wet or very-dry year doesn’t skew the baseline.

Water year. Hydrology runs Oct 1 → Sep 30. Most of a year’s snowpack accumulation is captured in the same season it melts.

Percentile (streamflow). 50 = exactly typical for this calendar date. 19 = today’s flow is lower than 81 % of all readings ever recorded on this date. 81 = lower than only 19 %.

VWC (soil moisture). Volumetric Water Content. Rough field bands: under 10 % = dry, 15–25 % = productive growing-season range, over 35 % = saturated.

Drought scale. D0–D4 from the U.S. Drought Monitor, weekly Thursday release. The percentages tell you what fraction of county area is at or worse than each band — a county can be 100 % at D2 with 0 % at D3.

Precip anomaly. Inches above or below the 1901–2000 average for the latest completed 1-, 3- and 12-month periods (NOAA NCEI Climate at a Glance, monthly data). Not the water year — the Water-Year Precip tile is the water-year measure. Anomaly is in inches; “% of median” is a ratio. Both useful; anomaly is easier to interpret when comparing a dry summer month to a wet spring month.

Forage Condition. A 0–100 county-scale index of rangeland forage conditions relative to this county’s own historical normal, blending satellite-observed vegetation response, growing-season moisture, drought stress, and usability. Higher = more favorable relative to local normal. Categories: 0–25 Poor, 26–50 Fair, 51–75 Good, 76–100 Excellent. Long-Term Forage Potential is a separate long-run rating, not part of the score. Beta — for regional screening and comparison, not a pasture-level forage inventory or stocking-rate recommendation.

How often this updates. The moisture and drought tiles (snowpack, streamflow, soil moisture, rain, water-year precip, drought class) refresh every morning. The Forage Condition score’s satellite vegetation read — and the separate Hay & Pasture read — refresh weekly (Mondays), because the underlying satellite imagery only updates on a ~16-day cycle. So the water tiles move day to day; the vegetation reads step forward about once a week.

Snowpack & Moisture Detail

SNOTEL station-by-station read for Powell County. The dashboard above gives current aggregate; this section shows where the water actually is.

Powell County snowpack is at or above median at all 1 reporting stations at the last spring reading (June 4, 2026). Snowpack has since melted out for the season, so this section shows how the 2026 snow season ended, not current conditions. One SNOTEL station monitors county snowpack. Powell County watershed snowpack near or above normal (N Fk Elk Creek 117% of median).

StationElev (ft)SWE (in)% of MedianRelevance
N Fk Elk Creek6,1800.0117%Powell County — elevation 6180 ft

Basin Index: Powell County watershed snowpack near or above normal (N Fk Elk Creek 117% of median). Drought Monitor (valid 2026-09-08): No drought (D1+) in the county. Coverage at or worse than each class: D0 21%, D1 0%, D2 0%, D3 0%, D4 0%. Station snapshot as of September 17, 2026 — live dashboard above is current.

Rancher implication. As of September 17, 2026: Powell County is abnormally dry (D0 21%) but not in drought; the past two weeks of rainfall ran well above normal (162%) and the next two are forecast well above normal (246%), supporting soil-moisture recharge and summer forage. Operations dependent on junior water rights should watch DNRC curtailment notices. Private treaty cattle buyers are active in this region through fall; current range conditions will factor into negotiated price slides.

Two-Week Rainfall

Observed (prior 14 days) and forecast (next 14 days) · Powell County · as of 2026-09-17

PeriodWindowRain (in)Normal (in)% of Normal
Prior 2 weeks (observed)Sep 3 – Sep 16, 20261.020.63162%
Next 2 weeks (forecast)Sep 17 – Sep 30, 20261.400.57246%

Observed detail: 4 measurable-rain day(s) in the prior two weeks; largest single day 0.37 in.

Forecast source: NWS/NOAA api.weather.gov (days 1–7) blended with Open-Meteo gridded model (days 8–14). The next-14-day total is model-derived — NOAA quantitative precipitation forecast is precise only through ~7 days, and days 8–14 are a model blend, not an observed gauge reading.

What this means. “Percent of normal” compares actual rain to the 30-year (1991–2020) average for the same calendar dates: 100% is a typical year, below 100% is drier than usual, above is wetter. Here, the past two weeks delivered 1.02 in of rain — 162% of the 0.63 in normally expected for this window, i.e. well above normal; the next two weeks are forecast at 1.40 in (246% of normal, well above normal), offering a realistic chance of soil-moisture recharge.

Water Rights, Irrigation & Land Ownership

The Clark Fork River drains the Powell County valley floor from the Deer Lodge narrows westward through the Warm Springs bottoms. Key confluences include Flint Creek entering near Warm Springs and the Little Blackfoot River joining near Garrison.

The Clark Fork system through Powell County supports irrigated hay and pasture on approximately 50,000 acres of valley floor, with water rights dating to the 1860s–1880s placer mining and early ranching era. Senior rights holders have priority through most summers, but the river is effectively over-appropriated below Warm Springs during drought years. The Anaconda Superfund legacy affects lower Clark Fork water quality but not primary agricultural diversions above Warm Springs. Secondary sources include the Little Blackfoot River drainage and direct-from-ditch systems off the Flint Creek drainage near Drummond. Well-water supplements are common on bench ground above the valley floor. Smaller creeks off the Garnet Range on the north side of the valley provide limited irrigation for operations on the north bench.

Federal Grazing Leases

BLM and U.S. Forest Service permitted grazing on public-land allotments · Powell County

SystemAllotmentsPermitted usePublic acres
BLM272,128 AUMs48,715
U.S. Forest Service2011,222 head-months131,776

AUMs (BLM) and head-months (USFS) are both animal-unit-months — one animal grazing for one month, the standard measure of authorized use. Acres are BLM public acres and USFS GIS acres on the mapped allotments.

Statewide maps: BLM allotment map · Forest Service allotment map. Excludes Montana DNRC state-trust grazing leases.

Land Resources

Three independent estimates of how Powell County’s land is used — shown side by side, never blended

Every acreage figure below comes from an independent source that measures the land a different way. We show them side by side — and never blend reported acreage, satellite pixels and tax classifications into one unexplained number. Total county area 1,488,667 acres · land in farms 549,419 acres (37% of the county).

🗺  Open the interactive land map for Powell County →
See crops, range, irrigated fields, public land and ownership parcels drawn live on the map.

Principal crops — official vs. satellite

CropUSDA Census 2022
(acres harvested)
Satellite CDL 2023
(acres present)
Winter wheat208
Spring wheatwithheld875
Barleywithheld784
Oatswithheld90
Corn113
Alfalfa hay30,80618,030
Other hay19,36019,344

These columns measure different things, so they should not match. The Census counts acres actually harvested in the census year, as reported by producers; the Cropland Data Layer counts every acre the satellite saw in that crop, including fields in a crop–fallow rotation and stands not harvested. Winter wheat is the clearest example: much of the county’s wheat ground sits in fallow in any given year, so the satellite total runs well above harvested acres. CDL also over-attributes hay and forage on native range. “Withheld” means the Census suppressed the value to protect an individual operation’s privacy.

How the county’s acres classify

Land classUSDA Census 2022Satellite CDL 2023DOR assessment 2026
Cropland (total)70,97439,91051,259
  of which harvested54,552
Irrigated land65,13546,800
Pasture & rangeland389,150664,704339,269
Forest / woodland76,658740,277932,602
Developed12,873
Water & wetlands22,933

Three ways of counting the same ground. Census figures are producer-reported acres in farms; the satellite column is a wall-to-wall pixel classification of the whole county (so it also sees developed land, water and non-farm ground the others do not); the assessment column is the Montana Department of Revenue’s parcel-level tax classification (CAMA), which is why its cropland total tracks the Census closely while the satellite tends to run higher. Developed and open-water rows come only from the satellite. Where they disagree, no single number is “wrong” — they are measuring different things.

Irrigated land, three independent ways

65,135
USDA Census
harvested irrigated cropland, 2022
58,652
DNRC mapped
remote-sensed irrigated extent
46,800
DOR assessed
tax classification, 2026

The single most important acreage figure for a cattle operation, and the three sources genuinely differ. The Census counts acres actually irrigated and harvested in the census year; the Montana DOR figure is what is classified and taxed as irrigated; the DNRC mapping captures the full remote-sensed irrigated extent, including ground that carries irrigation but was idle or in another use that year — so it usually reads highest. We publish all three rather than pick one.

What each estimate means

  • USDA Census of Agriculture — producer-reported, the official record. Highly credible, but taken every five years and suppressed in counties where a value would identify a single operation.
  • Satellite (Cropland Data Layer) — USDA’s annual, wall-to-wall satellite classification. Complete county coverage every year, but it infers crops from imagery, so it mislabels some ground and over-calls hay and forage on native range.
  • Tax / assessment — Montana Department of Revenue parcel-level classification from the CAMA assessment roll (2026 tax year), aggregated from the Montana State Library cadastral. Parcel- and ownership-based; a land classification, not an annual crop report.

Sources: USDA NASS Census of Agriculture 2022 (Quick Stats); USDA Cropland Data Layer 2023 (CropScape zonal statistics, USDA-NASS); Montana Department of Revenue CAMA assessment acreage via the MSDI cadastral parcels layer (tax year 2026); Montana DNRC Statewide Irrigation dataset. Prepared by Dirk Adams with the assistance of AI.

Local Help

Verified contacts and official destinations for Powell County — not a directory dump, just where to actually call

Local education
MSU Extension · Powell County
Agriculture, natural-resource and 4-H programs, plus hay- and soil-testing guidance.
Open office page →
Conservation
USDA Service Center
The NRCS and FSA offices serving Powell County — conservation programs and farm loans.
Official USDA locator →
Water rights
DNRC Helena Regional Office
Permits, changes, ownership updates and water-right questions for this county.
406-444-6999
DNRC water resources →
Cattle market
Montana Livestock Markets
Licensed auction markets, sale schedules and posted market reports statewide.
State market listing →
Brand inspection
Montana Brands Enforcement
Brand records, inspection districts and livestock-movement rules.
Dept. of Livestock →
Diagnostics
Schutter Diagnostic Lab
Plant, weed, insect and crop-disease diagnosis (MSU).
406-994-5150
Animal disease → MT Veterinary Diagnostic Lab
Lab guidance →

Extension, USDA, market, brand and diagnostic links go to the official Montana source; the DNRC office and phone are the specific regional office serving this county. Provider directories (veterinarians, feed dealers) will be added only once a repeatable verification standard is in place. Prepared by Dirk Adams with the assistance of AI.

Production & Sales

Operation character, hay base, and how cattle reach market from Powell County.

Cattle production

Powell County cattle operations are predominantly cow-calf with some backgrounding on valley floor irrigated pasture and Forest Service summer range on the Flint Creek and Garnet ranges. The Deer Lodge valley floor has a mix of 200–800 cow operations; larger ranches run yearlings on Forest Service allotments through summer before weaning and shipping in October. Several operations background calves through winter on stockpiled forage and hay, selling feeder cattle in spring. The presence of Deerlodge National Forest allotments is central to the production model — allotment conditions directly affect stocking rates and fall body condition scores.

Hay & winter feed

Irrigated timothy-brome and alfalfa-grass mixes dominate valley floor hay production; pure alfalfa is limited by altitude and frost risk at the 4,700-foot valley elevation. First cut typically runs late May to mid-June; second cut late July if water holds. Most operations put up 2.0–2.5 tons per acre in average years; dry years drop to 1.5 or below on the second cutting. On-farm hay storage is heavy here — most operations winter cattle without purchased feed in normal years.

Logistics · sale barns & trucking

Primary livestock shipping moves via I-90 through Deer Lodge town. The Missoula livestock auction (Western Livestock/Missoula Stockyards area) is 60 miles west on I-90 and handles most fall run cattle. Some operators truck to Billings (240 miles east) for heavier feeder markets. US-12 east over McDonald Pass connects to Helena and District 10 brand inspection. Seasonal road weight limits on county roads affect spring trucking out of bottom-ground operations.

Licensed Processing Plants

No federally inspected or state-inspected processing plant currently operates in Powell County — the nearest licensed plants are listed below

Federally inspected · USDA FSIS
Paumie’s Porkies (Georgetown Lake Holdings LLC)
Deer Lodge County
Est. M7706
219 E. Commercial St., Anaconda, MT 59711
(703) 568-3660
Processing only
Federally inspected · USDA FSIS
Old Salt Meat Company (Ranchland Packing)
Silver Bow County
Est. M2439 · P2439
1201 Centennial Ave., Butte, MT 59701
(480) 621-2189
Slaughter + processing
State inspected · MT Dept. of Livestock
Lolo Locker
Missoula County
Est. 003 · License 2076
6220 Caras Ln., Lolo, MT 59847
(406) 273-3876
Slaughter + processing

Meat from federally inspected and state-inspected plants can be sold; custom-exempt plants are not listed here. Verified August 2026 against the USDA FSIS Meat, Poultry & Egg Product Inspection Directory and the Montana Department of Livestock state plant list (Jan 2026). Grants of inspection change — call before you haul.

Powell County — 2023 Cattle Movement

Source: Montana Department of Livestock, BE-10 brand inspections. Released to Honest Cattle under public-records request. BE-10 inspections are recorded at change of ownership or interstate movement, so totals reflect transactions, not the standing herd.

Total head inspected
18,307
Stayed in Montana
6,844 (37.4%)
Shipped out of state
11,463 (62.6%)
Peak shipping month
October (9,746)

Top destinations outside Montana

StateHeadShare of county total
Nebraska3,31718.1%
Minnesota1,6268.9%
Iowa1,4527.9%
South Dakota1,4237.8%
Wyoming9375.1%

When Powell County cattle moved in 2023

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec

Notes: A single animal can be inspected more than once in a year if it changes hands or moves across state lines twice; destination is the buyer's state of record, which is usually but not always the final feedlot. Inspection county = where the inspection took place (often an auction yard or shipping point), not necessarily where the cattle were raised. Data covers cattle only (BE-10) and excludes horse and bison inspections.

Get the Weekly Forecast in Your Inbox

Montana cattle market analysis delivered every Monday.

Free weekly report. No spam.