← All Montana counties
Judith Basin County · Montana County Report

Judith Basin County, Montana

Central Montana · Stanford · Judith River headwaters · between Little Belt and Big Snowy mountains

Use this page to:
  • Check current snowpack, drought, streamflow, and soil moisture before stocking, hay buying, or destocking.
  • See where Judith Basin County calves moved in 2023 — destinations, seasonal pattern, and shipping windows.
  • Look up water rights, parcels, and ownership via Cadastral, DNRC WRQS, and WaterMapper.
  • Reach the District 3 brand inspector and verify cattle-buyer bonds before consigning.
Dashboard refreshes daily at 5:30 AM Mountain
Hay & Pasture — Greenness Now Greenness: Moderate · 65th percentile vs local normalA current satellite greenness read (last 16 days) of this county’s managed hay & pasture ground (NLCD class 81), versus its own history. It can run ahead of or behind snowpack and streamflow — read it alongside those tiles, not instead of them. Updated weekly.
How often this updates. The moisture and drought tiles below — snowpack, streamflow, soil moisture, rain, water-year precipitation, and drought class — refresh every morning. The Forage Condition score’s satellite vegetation read, and the separate Hay & Pasture read, refresh weekly (Mondays), because the underlying satellite imagery (RAP herbaceous biomass and MODIS NDVI; until the current season’s RAP publishes, a soil-moisture proxy stands in for the vegetation input) only updates on a roughly 16-day cycle. So the water and drought tiles move day to day, while the vegetation and hay-pasture reads step forward about once a week — a dry spell shows in the moisture tiles within a day, but takes a week or two to register in observed greenness.

Snowpack · SWE

0.00in SWE

Snow Water Equivalent — water that would result if today’s snowpack melted now.

7-day trend →
% of 1991–2020 median: 0%

Water-Year Precip

31.20in since Oct 1

Total precipitation since Oct 1 — the start of the NRCS water year.

% of 1991–2020 median for this date: 97%

Drought Monitor

D2severe drought

Worst drought class anywhere in the county per the U.S. Drought Monitor.

D0 100%D1 64%D2 0%D3 0%D4 0%

D0 abnormally dry · D1 moderate · D2 severe · D3 extreme · D4 exceptional. Percentages = share of county area at or worse than each class.

Streamflow

9cfs

Cubic feet per second flowing past the nearest in-county USGS gauge right now.

Judith River above Carr Creek near Utica
Day-of-year percentile: 9 (50 = typical for this date; 0 = lowest ever; 100 = highest ever)

Soil Moisture

21.2% shallow VWC
Drying for the growing season

VWC = Volumetric Water Content — the percent of soil volume that is water. Montana Mesonet probe average.

21.2%
11.6%

Shallow ≈ 4″ depth · Deep ≈ 20″ depth.
Bands (shallow + deep average): ≥ 30 % moist · 22–30 % adequate · 15–22 % drying · < 15 % dry.

Stations: 2
Δ

Precip Anomaly

-2.77″12-mo vs normal
Very dry year for the rolling 12-month window

Inches above (+) or below (−) the 1901–2000 average for the latest completed 1-, 3- and 12-month periods (NOAA NCEI, monthly data) — not the water year (see the separate Water-Year Precip tile for that).

-0.43″
-1.59″
-2.77″

1-mo = last 30 days · 3-mo = last 90 days · 12-mo = trailing year.
12-mo bands: > +1″ wet · −0.5″ to +1″ near normal · −2″ to −0.5″ dry · < −2″ very dry.

Reading this dashboard — what these terms mean

Median vs. mean. We use the median (NRCS standard) so a single very-wet or very-dry year doesn’t skew the baseline.

Water year. Hydrology runs Oct 1 → Sep 30. Most of a year’s snowpack accumulation is captured in the same season it melts.

Percentile (streamflow). 50 = exactly typical for this calendar date. 19 = today’s flow is lower than 81 % of all readings ever recorded on this date. 81 = lower than only 19 %.

VWC (soil moisture). Volumetric Water Content. Rough field bands: under 10 % = dry, 15–25 % = productive growing-season range, over 35 % = saturated.

Drought scale. D0–D4 from the U.S. Drought Monitor, weekly Thursday release. The percentages tell you what fraction of county area is at or worse than each band — a county can be 100 % at D2 with 0 % at D3.

Precip anomaly. Inches above or below the 1901–2000 average for the latest completed 1-, 3- and 12-month periods (NOAA NCEI Climate at a Glance, monthly data). Not the water year — the Water-Year Precip tile is the water-year measure. Anomaly is in inches; “% of median” is a ratio. Both useful; anomaly is easier to interpret when comparing a dry summer month to a wet spring month.

Forage Condition. A 0–100 county-scale index of rangeland forage conditions relative to this county’s own historical normal, blending satellite-observed vegetation response, growing-season moisture, drought stress, and usability. Higher = more favorable relative to local normal. Categories: 0–25 Poor, 26–50 Fair, 51–75 Good, 76–100 Excellent. Long-Term Forage Potential is a separate long-run rating, not part of the score. Beta — for regional screening and comparison, not a pasture-level forage inventory or stocking-rate recommendation.

How often this updates. The moisture and drought tiles (snowpack, streamflow, soil moisture, rain, water-year precip, drought class) refresh every morning. The Forage Condition score’s satellite vegetation read — and the separate Hay & Pasture read — refresh weekly (Mondays), because the underlying satellite imagery only updates on a ~16-day cycle. So the water tiles move day to day; the vegetation reads step forward about once a week.

Snowpack & Moisture Detail

SNOTEL station-by-station read for Judith Basin County. The dashboard above gives current aggregate; this section shows where the water actually is.

Judith Basin County snowpack is at or above median at all 1 reporting stations at the last spring reading (June 4, 2026). Snowpack has since melted out for the season, so this section shows how the 2026 snow season ended, not current conditions. One SNOTEL station monitors county snowpack. Judith Basin County watershed snowpack near or above normal (Spur Park 96% of median).

StationElev (ft)SWE (in)% of MedianRelevance
Spur Park8,0803.196%Judith Basin County — elevation 8080 ft

Basin Index: Judith Basin County watershed snowpack near or above normal (Spur Park 96% of median). Drought Monitor (valid 2026-09-08): Worst class D2 (severe) over 0.2% of the county. Coverage at or worse than each class: D0 100%, D1 64%, D2 0.2%, D3 0%, D4 0%. Station snapshot as of September 17, 2026 — live dashboard above is current.

Rancher implication. As of September 17, 2026: a small pocket of severe drought (D2, 0.2%); the past two weeks of rainfall ran well below normal (34%) and the next two are forecast well above normal (120%), supporting soil-moisture recharge and summer forage. Operations dependent on junior water rights should watch DNRC curtailment notices. Private treaty cattle buyers are active in this region through fall; current range conditions will factor into negotiated price slides.

Two-Week Rainfall

Observed (prior 14 days) and forecast (next 14 days) · Judith Basin County · as of 2026-09-17

PeriodWindowRain (in)Normal (in)% of Normal
Prior 2 weeks (observed)Sep 3 – Sep 16, 20260.320.9434%
Next 2 weeks (forecast)Sep 17 – Sep 30, 20260.840.70120%

Observed detail: 3 measurable-rain day(s) in the prior two weeks; largest single day 0.17 in.

Forecast source: NWS/NOAA api.weather.gov (days 1–7) blended with Open-Meteo gridded model (days 8–14). The next-14-day total is model-derived — NOAA quantitative precipitation forecast is precise only through ~7 days, and days 8–14 are a model blend, not an observed gauge reading.

What this means. “Percent of normal” compares actual rain to the 30-year (1991–2020) average for the same calendar dates: 100% is a typical year, below 100% is drier than usual, above is wetter. Here, the past two weeks delivered 0.32 in of rain — 34% of the 0.94 in normally expected for this window, i.e. well below normal; the next two weeks are forecast at 0.84 in (120% of normal, above normal), offering a realistic chance of soil-moisture recharge.

Water Rights, Irrigation & Land Ownership

The Judith River originates near Sapphire in the southern Little Belt Mountains and flows northeast through Stanford before entering Fergus County. Warm Spring Creek and Yogo Creek are key early tributaries feeding the upper basin.

The upper Judith system supports irrigated hay production in the Stanford valley and limited grain-land moisture supplementation. Senior rights on Warm Spring Creek and the mainstem date to the 1890s, with most valley floor rights established by 1910. Yogo Creek, draining the site of the historic Yogo sapphire mine, carries modest but reliable flows. The basin is not heavily over-appropriated at the headwaters, though late-season flows can drop sharply in dry years. Stock water developed springs from the Little Belt foothills provide secondary sources for upland range operations.

Federal Grazing Leases

BLM and U.S. Forest Service permitted grazing on public-land allotments · Judith Basin County

SystemAllotmentsPermitted usePublic acres
BLM22987 AUMs8,172
U.S. Forest Service2612,119 head-months167,594

AUMs (BLM) and head-months (USFS) are both animal-unit-months — one animal grazing for one month, the standard measure of authorized use. Acres are BLM public acres and USFS GIS acres on the mapped allotments.

Statewide maps: BLM allotment map · Forest Service allotment map. Excludes Montana DNRC state-trust grazing leases.

Land Resources

Three independent estimates of how Judith Basin County’s land is used — shown side by side, never blended

Every acreage figure below comes from an independent source that measures the land a different way. We show them side by side — and never blend reported acreage, satellite pixels and tax classifications into one unexplained number. Total county area 1,196,600 acres · land in farms 692,347 acres (58% of the county).

🗺  Open the interactive land map for Judith Basin County →
See crops, range, irrigated fields, public land and ownership parcels drawn live on the map.

Principal crops — official vs. satellite

CropUSDA Census 2022
(acres harvested)
Satellite CDL 2023
(acres present)
Winter wheat42,31061,319
Spring wheat11,38213,000
Durum wheat524
Barley22,19335,256
Oats3,020338
Cornwithheld1,361
Alfalfa hay51,049147,029
Other hay10,52547,932
Dry peas2,943453
Lentils1,643804
Chickpeas8801,702
Safflowerwithheld57
Canola2,5771,226
Flaxseed999565
Sorghum75

These columns measure different things, so they should not match. The Census counts acres actually harvested in the census year, as reported by producers; the Cropland Data Layer counts every acre the satellite saw in that crop, including fields in a crop–fallow rotation and stands not harvested. Winter wheat is the clearest example: much of the county’s wheat ground sits in fallow in any given year, so the satellite total runs well above harvested acres. CDL also over-attributes hay and forage on native range. “Withheld” means the Census suppressed the value to protect an individual operation’s privacy.

How the county’s acres classify

Land classUSDA Census 2022Satellite CDL 2023DOR assessment 2026
Cropland (total)231,032323,548247,885
  of which harvested151,697
Irrigated land11,0868,458
Pasture & rangeland449,959556,172507,147
Forest / woodland6,790293,915285,316
Developed12,858
Water & wetlands10,512

Three ways of counting the same ground. Census figures are producer-reported acres in farms; the satellite column is a wall-to-wall pixel classification of the whole county (so it also sees developed land, water and non-farm ground the others do not); the assessment column is the Montana Department of Revenue’s parcel-level tax classification (CAMA), which is why its cropland total tracks the Census closely while the satellite tends to run higher. Developed and open-water rows come only from the satellite. Where they disagree, no single number is “wrong” — they are measuring different things.

Irrigated land, three independent ways

11,086
USDA Census
harvested irrigated cropland, 2022
DNRC mapped
remote-sensed irrigated extent
8,458
DOR assessed
tax classification, 2026

The single most important acreage figure for a cattle operation, and the three sources genuinely differ. The Census counts acres actually irrigated and harvested in the census year; the Montana DOR figure is what is classified and taxed as irrigated; the DNRC mapping captures the full remote-sensed irrigated extent, including ground that carries irrigation but was idle or in another use that year — so it usually reads highest. We publish all three rather than pick one.

What each estimate means

  • USDA Census of Agriculture — producer-reported, the official record. Highly credible, but taken every five years and suppressed in counties where a value would identify a single operation.
  • Satellite (Cropland Data Layer) — USDA’s annual, wall-to-wall satellite classification. Complete county coverage every year, but it infers crops from imagery, so it mislabels some ground and over-calls hay and forage on native range.
  • Tax / assessment — Montana Department of Revenue parcel-level classification from the CAMA assessment roll (2026 tax year), aggregated from the Montana State Library cadastral. Parcel- and ownership-based; a land classification, not an annual crop report.

Sources: USDA NASS Census of Agriculture 2022 (Quick Stats); USDA Cropland Data Layer 2023 (CropScape zonal statistics, USDA-NASS); Montana Department of Revenue CAMA assessment acreage via the MSDI cadastral parcels layer (tax year 2026); Montana DNRC Statewide Irrigation dataset. Prepared by Dirk Adams with the assistance of AI.

Local Help

Verified contacts and official destinations for Judith Basin County — not a directory dump, just where to actually call

Local education
MSU Extension · Judith Basin County
Agriculture, natural-resource and 4-H programs, plus hay- and soil-testing guidance.
Open office page →
Conservation
USDA Service Center
The NRCS and FSA offices serving Judith Basin County — conservation programs and farm loans.
Official USDA locator →
Water rights
DNRC Lewistown Regional Office
Permits, changes, ownership updates and water-right questions for this county.
406-538-7459
DNRC water resources →
Cattle market
Montana Livestock Markets
Licensed auction markets, sale schedules and posted market reports statewide.
State market listing →
Brand inspection
Montana Brands Enforcement
Brand records, inspection districts and livestock-movement rules.
Dept. of Livestock →
Diagnostics
Schutter Diagnostic Lab
Plant, weed, insect and crop-disease diagnosis (MSU).
406-994-5150
Animal disease → MT Veterinary Diagnostic Lab
Lab guidance →

Extension, USDA, market, brand and diagnostic links go to the official Montana source; the DNRC office and phone are the specific regional office serving this county. Provider directories (veterinarians, feed dealers) will be added only once a repeatable verification standard is in place. Prepared by Dirk Adams with the assistance of AI.

Production & Sales

Operation character, hay base, and how cattle reach market from Judith Basin County.

Cattle production

Judith Basin runs a mix of cow-calf and retained stocker operations on native bunchgrass range between the mountain ranges. The county’s sheltered position allows for earlier spring green-up than neighboring plains counties, and some operators background calves into November before selling at Lewistown or Great Falls. A handful of operations hold Lewis and Clark National Forest allotments in the Little Belt Mountains. Dryland wheat farms are interspersed with cattle ranches throughout the basin, and some diversified operations run both.

Hay & winter feed

Flood-irrigated alfalfa and grass hay is produced along Warm Spring Creek and the upper Judith River valley, with first cutting typically in early-to-mid July. Irrigators hold relatively senior Judith River rights and most valley operations can complete two cuttings in wet years. Dryland hay on the surrounding benchlands provides backup tonnage but yields are highly year-dependent. Spring moisture through June is the primary determinant of dryland hay quality.

Logistics · sale barns & trucking

Stanford is the county seat on US-87, which runs south to White Sulphur Springs and north to Great Falls — roughly 65 miles to Great Falls. Most cattle are sold at Lewistown Livestock Auction in adjacent Fergus County or trucked directly to Billings or Great Falls feeders. The county’s small size and low cattle density mean local trucking infrastructure is minimal; producers typically contract out-county haulers.

Licensed Processing Plants

No federally inspected or state-inspected processing plant currently operates in Judith Basin County — the nearest licensed plants are listed below

Federally inspected · USDA FSIS
Big Sky Processing, LLC
Fergus County
Est. M46090
181 Cut Above Loop, Moore, MT 59464
(406) 220-3329
Slaughter + processing
State inspected · MT Dept. of Livestock
Elk Country Meats, LLC
Fergus County
Est. 020 · License 3K4Q
46 Rockford Rd., Moore, MT 59464
(406) 333-6328
Slaughter + processing
Federally inspected · USDA FSIS
Missouri River Meats (formerly Cascade Wholesale Meats)
Cascade County
Est. M7650 · P7650
2400 9th Ave. N., Great Falls, MT 59401
(406) 452-8513
Processing onlymeat & poultry

Meat from federally inspected and state-inspected plants can be sold; custom-exempt plants are not listed here. Verified August 2026 against the USDA FSIS Meat, Poultry & Egg Product Inspection Directory and the Montana Department of Livestock state plant list (Jan 2026). Grants of inspection change — call before you haul.

Judith Basin County — 2023 Cattle Movement

Source: Montana Department of Livestock, BE-10 brand inspections. Released to Honest Cattle under public-records request. BE-10 inspections are recorded at change of ownership or interstate movement, so totals reflect transactions, not the standing herd.

Total head inspected
76,722
Stayed in Montana
23,806 (31%)
Shipped out of state
52,916 (69%)
Peak shipping month
October (18,677)

Top destinations outside Montana

StateHeadShare of county total
Alberta34,67245.2%
Nebraska4,6006%
Colorado3,1154.1%
South Dakota2,0542.7%
Iowa1,9472.5%

When Judith Basin County cattle moved in 2023

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec

Notes: A single animal can be inspected more than once in a year if it changes hands or moves across state lines twice; destination is the buyer's state of record, which is usually but not always the final feedlot. Inspection county = where the inspection took place (often an auction yard or shipping point), not necessarily where the cattle were raised. Data covers cattle only (BE-10) and excludes horse and bison inspections.

Get the Weekly Forecast in Your Inbox

Montana cattle market analysis delivered every Monday.

Free weekly report. No spam.